成人X站

Google is being sued for allegedly protecting its monopoly illegally, and many believe the company simply has too much power. Geoffrey Fowler, a technology columnist with , joined Seattle鈥檚 Morning News to discuss the case.

鈥淚 think the picture is emerging that the Google that we think about as the young upstart, the guys in the Stanford dorm room working on building a company, just doesn’t exist anymore,鈥� he said.

Fowler has written about how Google search results can be very self-serving, often not providing the best information.

鈥淵ou see that over time Google has added a lot more advertisements to the top of search results, and those advertisements look more and more like actual search results. We have to do a lot more scrolling to actually get to the results of these days. It’s a little bit like Where’s Waldo?, but for information, that’s one problem that emerged,鈥� he said.

Looking at previous Amy Coney Barrett cases involving abortion, gun rights

鈥淎nother problem that emerged is that Google increasingly puts at the top of search results information that leads you back to Google,” he added. “I’m talking about Google YouTube results or Google Images or Google Maps, and there’s a little bit of a conflict of interest there because, first of all, they don’t necessarily always give you the best information, and second of all, Google makes more money from them and uses them to collect more of your data.鈥�

Is this being done deliberately? Or would it turn out if we did some research that the Google option in the search results was verifiably higher quality?

鈥淣ow Google would claim, of course, that it always gives us the most useful and and helpful information at the top. That’s what they say they’re always doing. And they claim, of course, they have our interests at heart. But the truth of the matter is Google is a very profit maximizing corporation,鈥� he said.

Twitter to pay WA $100,000 following campaign finance violations

鈥淪o whenever it has the opportunity to either make some money by putting more ads or kind of drive you back to the Google property as it tries to go deeper into things like video, and travel, and maps, it鈥檚 going to do that, too,” Fowler said. “My take is that at its core, Google has a conflict of interest now because it’s trying to get into so many things.鈥�

Fowler says this monopoly is potentially bad for consumers, bad for the economy, and stifles innovation.

鈥淭he Department of Justice didn’t actually call for Google to be split up per se, but I think that that we’re at a point where Google is just kind of the tip of the iceberg of Washington realizing that there are a couple of tech companies that frankly just have too much power over the internet economy, which increasingly is becoming our entire economy,鈥� he said.

鈥淎nd that is bad for consumers, but also just bad for our economy. It stifles innovation. I mean, good luck to anybody who wanted to start a rival search engine right now,” Fowler added. “It couldn’t even gain any traction at all because Google has locked up these contracts with companies like Apple to be the default search engine on all those iPhones. And, you know, their core argument here is that, well, people choose Google because Google is great and everybody loves Google. But if that was the case, would it really be spending that much money with Apple to make sure it’s the default?鈥�

Listen to Seattle鈥檚 Morning News weekday mornings from 5 鈥� 9 a.m. on 成人X站 Radio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to the聽podcast here.