Ross: Impeachment trials should draw a line
Feb 8, 2021, 6:33 AM | Updated: 12:32 pm

The US Supreme Court is seen as National Guard secure the the grounds on Feb. 8, 2021, in Washington, DC. Trump faces a single article of impeachment that accuses him of incitement of insurrection on the Jan. 6 riot at the US Capitol, which left five people dead, including a Capitol Police officer. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
(Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Does anybody remember when Bill Clinton was tried in the Senate for lying and obstruction?
I remember feeling embarrassed as an American that any president would do what he did RIGHT THERE in the Oval Office! I could understand why you would want to make an example of him. Draw a line.
You know what I can’t understand? Hearing Ken Starr, the guy who prosecuted Clinton, saying that tomorrow’s impeachment trial shouldn’t be happening:
“This is very unfortunate, perhaps reading Martin Luther King Junior’s letter from a Birmingham Jail might be helpful. It’s going nowhere, it should go nowhere …”
He brought up King’s . That letter was a call to action against white supremacy at a time King’s fellow clergymen wanted him to wait. Why would you invoke that in defense of egging on people who broke into the Capitol with a confederate flag? I don’t know.
What I DO know is there are five current members of the Senate – Grassley, Crapo, Inhof, Shelby, and McConnell – who voted guilty at Clinton’s trial, and who will now be voting on the case of a sitting president who told his own vice president to disavow the Constitution for the purpose of seizing a second term he didn’t win.
It appears they will let that slide. And if they do, I will at least take some consolation in knowing that they DID draw the line on a president lying about his erotic distractions.
Because nobody wants a guy like THAT in the White House ever again.
Listen to Seattle’s Morning News weekday mornings from 5 – 9 a.m. on ³ÉÈËXÕ¾ Radio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to the podcast here.