成人X站

With director bookending his latest historical epic with a pair of appearances — the first being a direct thank you to the audience and the last being an in-film cameo — he’s distinctly coming to terms with his mortality as his film documents the ruthless yet systematic genocidal takedown of the then-wealthy and its people in the post-World War I American frontier.

Across its three-and-a-half-hour runtime, “” follows a courtship and ensuing marriage between an Osage woman Molly, played by , and a simple-minded, white veteran, Ernest Burkhart, played by , as the latter struggles to balance his love for Molly and the biddings of a henchman who happens to be his rich uncle, William Hale, played by Scorsese’s first muse .

Based on David Grann’s nonfiction of the same name, “Killers of the Flower Moon” marks the first time Scorsese has ever worked with both DiCaprio and De Niro on a film together.

More on Native Americans in the 19th and 20th century: Federal Indian boarding schools implemented systematic cultural whitewashing, new report reveals

At times an investigative mystery, at moments a powerful romantic tale, and consistently a story about American crime, this is Scorsese’s first foray into the Western genre, which is hallowed ground for some of our greatest filmmakers.

The Wild West and its various stages of conquest is as alive in film today as it was when was twirling a rifle against the backdrop of the American Southwest. magnum opus “” features plentiful oil fields on uncompromised land and its inevitable consequences of said discovery, while and Best Picture-winning “” brings the frontier to the modern world. masterful “” flips the genre on its head altogether, just as did with “.”

Even “” finds itself on horseback when Los Alamos, New Mexico, becomes home to the Manhattan Project.

But unlike the previously mentioned films, this blood-drenched Western prominently features the indigenous people of America. Christopher Cote, an Osage language consultant on the film, revealed some “strong opinions” on the film in an interview with , including the decision to have the audience see this violent tyranny through the eyes of a white man, Burkhart.

“I think, in the end, the question that you can be left with is: How long will you be complacent with racism? How long will you go along with something and not say something, not speak up? How long will you be complacent? I think that’s because this film isn’t made for an Osage audience, it was made for everybody, not Osage. For those who have been disenfranchised they can relate, but for other countries that have their acts and their history of oppression, this is an opportunity for them to ask themselves this question of morality, and that’s how I feel about this film.”

Whether or not everyone will agree with Cote’s takeaways, debating whether or not the film should have been more focused on the Indigenous peoples and not the wolves that feast upon them, it’s hard to deny that Scorsese is in full control of this meticulously studied masterpiece. From its stunning production design to keeping the film’s tempo on beat with her ingenious editing style to the late ‘s haunting tribal score, anchored by a lumbering war drum to remind the audience that tumult and pain are always lurking around the corner for the Osage tribe, nothing in its 206-minute runtime gets away from Scorsese’s enduring thesis.

‘Boys in the Boat’: Iconic UW rowing team subject of new George Clooney film

It’s a near-impossible feat from DiCaprio, who’s incessant on only taking on the most complicated of parts at this point in his career, as he fails to be boxed into the archetype of Scorsese’s past anti-heroes, but can’t be defined as a traditional hero either. Without any charisma to lean on, DiCaprio delivers his most labyrinthine performance to date.

But similar to turn as J. Robert Oppenheimer in “Oppenheimer,” DiCaprio’s performance doesn’t overpower the rest of the cast, allowing every subsequent actor to steal scenes when necessary.

And no one did it better than Lily Gladstone, whose eyes pierce through the screen as she alternates between her native language and English. Her journey is nearly impenetrable, donning various Pendleton blankets to shield as much of her internal pain as she can. When its finally too much to bear, her screams and wails brought shivers and convulsions upon the audience as viewers threw their hands over their eyes.

But this is a film about greed, a motif consistent throughout Scorsese’s catalog. While Jordan Belfort’s greed represented an industry in “,” a singular man’s greed in “Killers of the Flower Moon” represents a country born on the principle that it can be stolen if you’re barbarous enough. Scorsese’s critique on is channeled through DiCaprio’s tumultuous relationships with those he holds dear, and it’s delivered with devastating effect.

Culminating in jaw-dropping silhouettes of men encased in fire,聽cinematographer created Hell on Earth for the Osage Nation for viewers to witness, only for this moment in time to be erased by a coat of white paint. Scorsese’s films have always been drenched with violence, but the murders on screen in “Killers of the Flower Moon” are some of his most gut-wrenching, with the audience forced to sit with the painful aftermath. There’s a reckoning in his oft-violent style, as if Scorsese is acknowledging his past films and how isolated this film can be compared to the rest of his works.

“Killers of the Flower Moon” reveals a tapestry of systematic cultural whitewashing against the Osage, as members attempt to overcome famine, disease and alcoholism. The white members of the community learn to manipulate those struggles. Scorsese isn’t shy to display how everything about Manifest Destiny was created to kill off Native Americans, with bloodshed always an effective final expedient.

The Osage pray for a miracle throughout, channeling their dwindling culture to reach out to higher powers after being stonewalled by police and government, but as William Hale said, “expecting a miracle to make all this go away? You know they don’t happen anymore.”

“Killers of the Flower Moon” is a haunting triumph as Scorsese attempts to create an everlasting film for the sixth straight decade.

Frank’s score: 4/5

Double feature choice: “The Wolf of Wall Street”

Local ties to ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’

Before Lily Gladstone became Molly Burkhart in what’s assumed to be an Oscar-nominated performance, she lived in and attended before studying at the . She originally grew up on the reservation in Montana as she has Blackfeet and Nim铆ipuu heritage. She moved to Snohomish County after middle school.

As My Edmonds News , fans were invited to join friends, teachers, and former classmates of Gladstone for a reserved screening of the film, which was shown Friday evening at the , in Mountlake Terrace.

The Mountlake Terrace premiere was spearheaded by Kimberly Nelson, a retired Mountlake Terrace High School teacher who also helped with the school’s drama department and remembers Gladstone fondly.

“She was always well-grounded and kind,” Nelson said of Gladstone to . “She had a quiet humor.”

Nelson went on to describe Gladstone as a “comedy assassin” because she would say a quip that would get the entire room laughing.

She also noted Gladstone was always her own woman, even at 15. Nelson added Gladstone has .

Gladstone also appeared on the cover of British Vogue with Leonardo DiCaprio alongside her while adorning a blanket made by Seattle’s very own . Specifically, it’s the local company’s .

“It’s black and grey and wool. It has this wonderful feel to it, but it’s also iconic in that American art and design is shaped by Native art and design,” Colleen Echohawk, CEO of Eighth Generation, told . “Real American art and design is Native American art and design so we think this blanket is so popular with so many people is that it gives off that vibe of authenticity of a Native product that people can put into their home.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

Other movie news

Taylor Swift is also in movie theaters with her concert film “.” The film brought in $123.5 million globally in ticket sales over its three-day debut and Thursday night previews, making it the fifth-biggest opening of any theatrical release this year. Christopher Nolan applauded Swift’s decision to sidestep streaming services in favor of a theatrical experience.

More film reviews: ‘A Haunting in Venice’ is Branagh at his most macabre 鈥� with middling success

“Taylor Swift is about to show the studios, because her concert film is not being distributed by the studios, it鈥檚 being distributed by a theater owner, AMC, and it鈥檚 going to make an enormous amount of money,” Nolan said, according to . “And this is the thing, (theatrical exhibition is) a format and a way of seeing things and sharing stories, or sharing experiences, that鈥檚 incredibly valuable. And if (the studios) don’t want it, somebody else will. So that’s just the truth of it.”

Martin Scorsese may have just released his 26th feature film a month before he turns 81, but he’s already locked in on his next project. The acclaimed director is set to adapt another nonfiction book, this time “The Wager” focuses on a British ship crew’s journey for treasure, their subsequent stranding on a desert island and the subsequent events that unfold upon their return. Leonardo DiCaprio will lead the cast.