成人X站

The Seattle City Council will vote next week on a key part of a landmark designation for an old Sea-First Bank branch on Denny Way, and historic preservation advocates are worried that the city is about to make a big mistake.

The old bank branch at Denny Way and 6th Avenue has been home to a Walgreens for many years. It was originally built by Seattle-First National Bank in 1950, and Eugenia Woo of the preservation advocacy group said it served as the prototype for many similar branches built around the state. It鈥檚 a classic midcentury modern building, and it included one of the city’s earliest drive-thru teller areas – a feature emblematic of the post-World War II, car-focused era.

Parkland School advocates score two victories in preservation campaign

In 2006, the building was designated as a landmark by the in recognition of multiple architectural and historical factors. It was determined to be significant in four of the six possible categories that are part of Seattle landmark designations.

Somehow 鈥� for reasons that aren鈥檛 clear – Walgreens took their time in coming to the table to do the last step of the landmark process, which is agreeing to a series of 鈥渃ontrols and incentives鈥� to preserve specific elements of the building and to provide public benefit by preserving a structure possessing attributes which contribute to the visual landscape.

These 鈥渃ontrols and incentives鈥� are the legal part of the landmark designation that most protects the historic building from future changes or demolition because it legally requires the owner to abide by mutually-agreed conditions. Once the controls and incentives are negotiated between Landmark Preservation Board staff and the building鈥檚 owner, a letter is signed by both parties. Then, the whole landmark designation package goes to a Seattle City Council committee 鈥� 鈥溾�� 鈥� for their review and vote before it goes to the full City Council for formal legal adoption as an ordinance.

This process happens all the time with Seattle landmarks, so it鈥檚 typically just an administrative or ministerial function, said Woo of Historic Seattle.

For unknown reasons, this typically routine process has played out very differently for the old Sea-First branch over the past several weeks.

Back on Dec. 9, 2022, when the Neighborhoods, Education, Civil Rights, and Culture Committee reviewed the ordinance (which included the controls and incentives agreement) prior to voting and forwarding it to the full council, the members started talking about the importance of housing, and about how that neighborhood has changed since the landmark designation in 2006. Neither of these subjects relates to the landmark designation and what the owner had already agreed to do as part of reaching an agreement with the staff of the Seattle Landmarks Board.

The Dec. 9 discussion of the merits of the old bank as a historic landmark began with , chair of the committee.

Remembering the Whidbey air crew detained in China

鈥淧reserving this particular one-story [bank] doesn’t make sense given the housing crisis that we’re in,鈥� Councilmember Morales said. 鈥淎nd that the neighborhood has changed dramatically since 2006 before South Lake Union and the areas around there changed so dramatically.

鈥淪o I have been giving this a lot of consideration,鈥� Councilmember Morales continued. 鈥淚t is my belief that this building would be better served, we would be better served as a city if we were able to use this site differently. So I can’t support this project and will be voting 鈥楴o.鈥欌��

Then, the three other members of the committee who were present 鈥� (whose district includes the old bank), Councilmember Sara Nelson, and Councilmember Dan Strauss 鈥� joined with Councilmember Morales in voicing their opposition to the ordinance based on their feelings that the bank building was not significant enough to preserve, especially in a neighborhood that鈥檚 getting denser in a city that needs more housing.

The committee then voted unanimously against the ordinance, effectively recommending that the full council reject the landmark designation and the already agreed-upon controls and incentives 鈥� which would essentially render the landmark status meaningless.

A council staff person named Lish Whitson was taking part in the meeting and had given a presentation before the discussion. Before they took a vote, Whitson diplomatically reminded the council what they were being asked to decide.

鈥淛ust to remind the council that your decision is on the controls and incentives and not the designation of the structure, which is the purview of the Landmarks Preservation Board,鈥� Whitson said.

Whitson鈥檚 remarks didn鈥檛 appear to have any effect on the council members or to change the nature of the discussion or, ultimately, the outcome of the 4-0 vote against the ordinance.

Since then, Seattle preservation groups, including the Queen Anne Historical Society and preservation advocates Historic Seattle, have been trying to spread the word that the process has gone off the rails for the old Sea-First branch. They鈥檝e sent letters to the Seattle City Council and are encouraging people who care about preservation and about housing to let the council know they should vote in favor of landmarking the old bank on Denny Way and adopting the controls and incentives.

Woo told 成人X站 Newsradio that nobody in the preservation community understands why the committee chose to vote the way they did and, essentially, ignore the legal process in place for landmark designations and controls and incentives. Woo says this sets a bad precedent for Seattle鈥檚 landmark process, which has been in place for half a century.

More from Feliks: Seattle event 40 years ago was a 鈥楴ew Wave boat show鈥�

Regarding the need for housing and more density in Seattle, Woo agrees. But, she says there are actually ways through something called 鈥淭ransfer of Development Rights鈥� where the old bank being designated a landmark through an ordinance (with the 鈥渃ontrols and incentives鈥�) can actually facilitate more housing in that neighborhood.

Woo says the committee is doing a disservice to the full council 鈥� who will vote next week – by pitting preservation against housing.

鈥淲e’ve always said that it’s not either-or, it’s both, and preservation and housing, they’re not mutually exclusive,鈥� Woo said. 鈥淎nd it’s a false choice to have to choose between them.鈥�

成人X站 Newsradio reached out to Councilmember Lewis early Thursday evening 鈥� and to Councilmember Morales and again to Councilmember Lewis early Friday morning 鈥� but neither has responded.

The full council will vote on the landmark designation and the 鈥渃ontrols and incentives鈥� on the old Sea-First branch at their next meeting Tuesday, Jan. 10.

You can hear Feliks every Wednesday and Friday morning on Seattle’s Morning News with Dave Ross and Colleen O’Brien, read more from him here, and subscribe to The Resident Historian Podcast here. If you have a story idea, please email Feliks here.