Left-wing activist groups have judge-shopped in various districts around the country, hoping for a partisan judge to issue a nationwide, universal injunction to stop the Trump agenda. In many cases, the activists and judges know the case will be overturned and Trump will come out the victor. But the goal, in these cases, is to stall the Trump agenda as long as humanly possible. It’s lawfare at its most corrupt, and SCOTUS just put an end to it.

Ironically, the decision comes from a birthright citizenship case that Trump will almost certainly lose as it maneuvers its way through the courts. But perhaps that was the point? To force a liberal judge to offer a universal injunction so that the Trump administration could fast-track 迟丑补迟听issue to SCOTUS.

Here’s what the SCOTUS majority ruled on universal injunctions

Justice Amy Coney Barrett鈥檚 majority opinion in Trump v. CASA, Inc. held that federal courts exceeded their authority by issuing 鈥渦niversal injunctions鈥� blocking President Trump鈥檚 Executive Order 14160 nationwide. The Court did not rule on the legality of the Executive Order itself鈥攚hich denies birthright citizenship in some cases鈥攂ut instead focused on whether lower courts had the power under the Judiciary Act of 1789 to issue nationwide injunctions.

“The applications do not raise鈥攁nd thus we do not address鈥攖he question whether the Executive Order violates the Citizenship Clause or Nationality Act,” Barrett said in the majority opinion. “The issue before us is one of remedy: whether, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, federal courts have equitable authority to issue universal injunctions.”

Barrett explained that courts at the founding did not issue such broad injunctions, and thus modern federal courts lack that authority under long-established precedent. She further reasoned that injunctions should be tailored to provide 鈥渃omplete relief鈥� only to the plaintiffs in the case鈥攏ot to everyone who might be affected.

What did the liberal SCOTUS Justices argue?

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson鈥檚 dissent is an over-the-top and theatrical defense of universal injunctions that reads more like a political manifesto than a judicial opinion.

She argues that federal courts must be able to block illegal government action, as they see it, not just for plaintiffs, but for everyone. It’s a scary vision where individual judges act as all-purpose enforcers of constitutional rights. Jackson warns that restricting this power tears a 鈥済ash鈥� in the Constitution and could inflict a 鈥渕ortal wound鈥� on the judiciary鈥檚 role. She claims that judges aren鈥檛 just referees settling disputes but constitutional guardians who must prevent unlawful executive policies from taking root anywhere.

But Justice Barrett wasn’t having it, offering a blistering takedown in the majority opinion, easily dismantling it.

Barrett notes that universal injunctions are a modern invention. If anything, Barrett argues, Jackson鈥檚 vision of judicial power ignores both legal history and separation of powers, embracing the concept of judicial supremacy. Allowing judges to issue universal injunctions at will turns every district judge into a national policymaker. Barrett rightly sees that as dangerous and destabilizing.

In the end, Jackson writes as if the sky is falling, claiming courts will be powerless to protect the public. Barrett calmly replies that courts still protect plaintiffs鈥攖hey just don鈥檛 get to act like emperors, a concept the Radical Left keeps claiming is being embraced by conservatives. Judicial authority, Barrett said, isn鈥檛 unlimited.

What does this mean for the lawfare strategy?

This is a major win鈥攏ot just for Trump, but for both the integrity of the judicial system and the American people.

For years, left-wing activists have used lawfare as a political weapon, finding sympathetic judges in blue districts to issue universal injunctions that block conservative policies nationwide, even before they take effect. It’s been their favorite tactic to override the will of voters by letting unelected judges function as mini-dictators. Conservative groups did the same, just not to this extent. And it was done in bad faith.

Justice Barrett鈥檚 opinion just cut the legs out from under that strategy. No longer can a random activist judge in Seattle or San Francisco block federal law coast-to-coast because some activist group doesn鈥檛 like a policy. Lawsuits now only protect the actual plaintiffs. Quite the concept, right!? This shuts down the Left鈥檚 鈥渟ue-and-freeze鈥� playbook that鈥檚 been used to paralyze Trump鈥檚 agenda and bully Republican administrations into submission.

And let鈥檚 not gloss over the fact that Trump is once again vindicated. He signed the Executive Order on birthright citizenship. The activist courts tried to kill it with a universal injunction. But now, the Supreme Court stepped in and affirmed what Trump鈥攁nd conservatives鈥攈ad been saying all along: the judiciary is out of control and hyper-partisan.

This decision is a brutal loss for the Radical Left and a massive blow to the tactic of forum-shopping for national wins. The lawfare era is crumbling, and it’s Trump that’s still standing.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽

Activists held a Juneteenth event at Jimi Hendrix Park that attracted over 8,500 people, according to organizer Anthony Tibbs. But the celebration, for some, was apparently incomplete without the God-given right to park wherever they pleased. After parking enforcement did what it鈥檚 supposed to do鈥攅nforce the law鈥攁nd ticketed illegally parked cars in a residential neighborhood, the predictable screeches of racism began.

Cars were illegally parked in vendor spots, and others were blocking the bus zone and impeding traffic. Another blocked a fire hydrant, and others were generally creating traffic problems for the residents of the neighborhood who, presumably, also have a right to access their own homes.

“The supervisor stated that the impeding of traffic and the bus zone created a safety issue that would have ended up with full blockage as buses tried to stop to load/unload passengers in the lane of travel,” a spokesperson for Seattle Police explained to “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH.

In the end, there were only 12 citations written. Parking enforcement officers mostly offered verbal warnings.聽But in the woke logic of Seattle activism, holding people accountable for their actions is a 鈥渕ishap鈥� or an 鈥渋ssue of disparity.鈥�

Parking tickets are now racist? At a Juneteenth event, yes

Tibbs complained to聽The Seattle Medium聽that 鈥渋t is unfortunate that such issues of disparity continue to surround our people.鈥�

What disparity is he talking about? The disparity between those who follow parking laws and those who don鈥檛? The expectation that laws apply equally to everyone, regardless of their race or the event they are attending, is the very definition of equality. To suggest that a specific group should be exempt from those laws because of their race is, ironically, the very definition of racism.

It鈥檚 an insult to the spirit of Juneteenth itself鈥攁 day celebrating the moment the law was finally and equally applied to all Americans, proclaiming freedom for all. To twist that legacy into a demand for special treatment and exemption from the basic rules that govern a civil society is a perversion of everything the day stands for.

Demanding an apology

Arguably, the most absurd reaction came from former State Representative Dawn Mason. The Seattle Medium聽claimed she was “speaking on behalf of Seattle鈥檚 Black community.” Who knew the entire community had a spokesperson?

She described the event as 鈥�8,000-plus peaceful, mostly African American celebrants at Jimi Hendrix Park. A family-friendly environment.鈥� The description is meant to conjure an image of wholesome community, which I have no doubt it was. But it鈥檚 also a deliberate rhetorical setup. By emphasizing the race of the attendees, she lays the groundwork to frame any enforcement action as a racial attack.

Mason said she 鈥渁ppealed to Chief Barnes to have all the tickets voided and publicly apologize to [the] African American community for this insult.鈥� It’s Mason who should apologize.

An insult? The true insult is the belief that members of the black community are so fragile that they cannot be expected to follow the same basic rules as everyone else. The real insult is the soft bigotry of low expectations, dressed up as progressive advocacy. The notion that you should get a pass on a parking ticket because of your skin color is one of the most absurd and patronizing arguments.

Social justice shakedown

This is a social justice shakedown. It鈥檚 the grievance grift in its purest form. It鈥檚 the cynical use of historical injustice to demand modern-day privileges.

It’s one thing to argue that drivers were caught off guard because parking is聽驳别苍别谤补濒濒测听free on holidays, including Juneteenth. But in this case, the cars were parked in areas that are聽补濒飞补测蝉听illegal to park in, and no one could reasonably think they can block a bus line or fire hydrant because it’s a holiday.

“We understand and are aware of the frustration felt from parking enforcement that occurred during the celebration鈥攅specially given the significance of this federal holiday. While enforcement at paid parking spots and certain restricted areas鈥攖hat note exemptions on holidays鈥攊s adjusted on federal holidays, parking rules that address public safety 鈥� such as blocking fire hydrants, bus zones, or load and unload zones 鈥攔emain in effect regardless of the holiday,” a Seattle Police spokesperson explained to “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH.

The complaints are uninspired. Activists again seek to create a system where accountability is optional, but only for certain, politically favored groups. What happens when a resident can鈥檛 get out of their driveway for an emergency? What about the worker who has to circle the block for 30 minutes, burning gas they can鈥檛 afford, because someone decided the rules didn鈥檛 apply to them? Their inconvenience, apparently, doesn鈥檛 count, no matter their skin color.

The demand for a public apology from the Chief of Police is the cherry on top of this ridiculous grift. Apologize for what? For treating all citizens equally under the law? This is an attempt to intimidate law enforcement, to bully the city into carving out special exceptions based on identity politics.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽

So naturally, progressives who can鈥檛 define what a woman is are now applauding the science. Yes, even Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe, who have long advocated for men competing in women鈥檚 sports, are suddenly real big fans of gender-based research.

The sidewalk murals align with Harrell’s uninspired . One of the action steps? “Create more murals and other art installations throughout Downtown and activate street corners, parks, and transit stations with buskers and other forms of entertainment to create a more beautiful and welcoming environment, mitigating the impact of graffiti and street disorder.” Harrell, via a spokesperson, said this particular project was sponsored by the Downtown Seattle Association.

The logic, if you can call it that, seems to be that if we make the scenery prettier, the human suffering playing out against it will somehow be less tragic. It鈥檚 a continuation of the same tired, ineffective, and lazy approach we鈥檝e seen countless times from our city鈥檚 leadership. Harrell is a master of the performative gesture, the symbolic act that accomplishes nothing but allows the mayor to pat himself on the back for a job well done.

This is not a parody. This is the actual strategy of a city in the throes of a humanitarian crisis.

Note: This piece originally attributed the mural to the mayor’s office when it was sponsored by the Downtown Seattle Association. A Harrell spokesperson says the “initiative is aligned with one of the goals of the mayor鈥檚 Downtown Activation Plan to increase public art opportunities, [but] this specific project was not completed by the City or mayor鈥檚 Office.”

Bruce Harrell’s homelessness plans? Sidewalk art and lighting

This sidewalk mural initiative is a perfect companion piece to another of the mayor鈥檚 recent beautification-as-solution projects: strings of lights a few blocks away from where the homeless congregate.

Billed as a way to 鈥渆nhance community safety and vibrancy,鈥� the decorative lights are meant to deter crime and make residents feel more secure. But ask anyone who lives or works in the downtown core and Belltown, and they鈥檒l tell you that the problem isn鈥檛 a lack of ambient lighting. The problem is the open-air drug markets, the relentless property crime, and the sense that the city has all but abandoned them to the wolves.

The lights and sidewalk murals are a slap in the face to a community that has been begging for a real plan, for more police, and for a commitment to prosecuting the criminals who are making their lives a living hell.

Seattle residents should be insulted

What these initiatives share is a fundamental misunderstanding, or perhaps a willful ignorance, of the nature of the problem.

We are not dealing with a crisis of aesthetics. We are dealing with a crisis of addiction, of mental illness, and of a complete and utter breakdown of law and order. Painting a mural on a sidewalk will not get a fentanyl addict into treatment. Installing a light fixture will not stop a prolific offender from breaking into another small business.

These are solutions for a city that is not in crisis, for a city that has the luxury of worrying about its appearance. That is not Seattle.

We actually know what tackles homelessness

The tragic irony is that we know what works. We know that a compassionate, but firm approach, one that combines robust and readily available treatment options with a law enforcement presence that makes it clear that criminal behavior will not be tolerated, is the only way to make a real difference.

Seattle should be investing in long-term treatment facilities, in mental health care, and in a criminal justice system that is allowed to do its job. Instead, we get murals and mood lighting. Soon? Buskers.

It鈥檚 a tale of two cities. In the Seattle mayor鈥檚 press releases, the city is becoming more vibrant, more beautiful, and more welcoming with each passing day. In the real Seattle, the one that the rest of us have to live in, things are getting worse. The open-air drug use, the homeless encampments, the property crime鈥攖hese are the realities that a fresh coat of paint and some light bulbs cannot hide.

The people of Seattle are not asking for a more scenic city. Our city is beautiful鈥攚hen you clean up the mess made by the homeless.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

Listen to the Jake and Spike Show every weekday from 12pm – 3pm on 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM. Listen to 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM or go to MyNorthwest.com to learn more!

At Monday’s unsuccessful Club World Cup match against Paris Saint-Germain, the supporters’ section at Lumen Field was once again awash in Palestinian flags. These flags have become a symbol of antisemitism; a rebuke of a country fighting a terrorist group, Hamas. When activists wave Palestinian flags, they’re taking a “Free Palestine!” position, believing Israel is on “stolen” Palestinian land. That they engaged in this behavior right after the United States struck Iran’s nuclear sites is revealing.

This wasn’t about cheering on their team, and the display had nothing to do with professional soccer or the Sounders. It was a typical brazen, defiant, radical political statement by groups who have long operated outside the bounds of reasonable fan conduct, without any meaningful consequence. There won’t be this time, either.

These aren’t your typical passionate fans, either. They’re radical, far-left groups, many of whom as Antifa. They consistently flout stadium rules, using the Sounders鈥� need for “fan engagement” as leverage. It鈥檚 an arrangement that allows them to push a divisive agenda, alienating many potential fans and undermining the very sport they claim to support. This isn’t inclusivity; it’s virtue signaling that only serves to highlight their own narrow, ideological echo chamber.

Too many fans are the absolute worst.

And the club rarely says a thing or offers any meaningful consequences. They wouldn鈥檛 want to upset the supporter groups, even if their radical politics reminds people that the club is anything but inclusive.

鈥� Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz)

Sounders FC’s embrace of antisemitism is hardly new

Monday’s display of Palestinian flags, which violates stadium rules, is part of a pattern, not an anomaly.

The club鈥檚 updated code of conduct “flags of Israel or Palestine,” yet these groups routinely ignore it. And what does the club do? Virtually nothing. Sometimes they get a “stern talking to,” the bare minimum so that the club can say they did something if they’re ever pressed. Of course, local left-wing media almost never presses them.

In this case, because it’s a FIFA event, the front office can conveniently sidestep this issue. It’s not technically their event, so FIFA can take a stance if it wants. Something tells me that if the supporters group held up messaging the club felt was sufficiently offensive enough, they wouldn’t stay quiet.

The front office clings to that silence, hoping to avoid public scrutiny and sidestep media questions that might force them to confront the radical fringe they’ve emboldened. Why? Because the Sounders, as evidenced by declining attendance figures, feel like they must placate a hardcore base that cares more about political posturing than wins.

And what came of the Sounders’ tepid condemnation of antisemitic team minority owner Macklemore, exactly?

Seattle Sounders fans put on a big show of solidarity with Palestine during their FIFA Club World Cup game against PSG. Photos by Juan Mabromata and Buda Mendes.

—

Embracing fringe politics stifles Sounders growth

When I was part of the broadcast team for the Sounders, there was talk of filling Lumen Field as if it were a Seahawks game. But rather than grow the team, the front desk leaned into political positions and placated the most radical fans. They’ve suffered as a consequence.

The Sounders’ attendance has been declining, dropping from peaks in the 40,000s in the to an average of 30,754 . The team is actively trying to “rebuild their fan base,” even launching a “First Match On Us” promotion to bring in new attendees. This isn’t the sign of a thriving, growing franchise; it’s the sign of a team grasping at straws, all while allowing a vocal, radical minority to define its public image.

Want to grow attendance and exploit World Cup interest? It should stop embracing radical political views. As the front office is finding out, there’s not an appetite to attend a political rally filled with antisemites and socialists at Lumen Field.

I can鈥檛 watch them anymore. Used to be a big fan too.

鈥� Pilgrims (@pilgramsandnuts)

Sounders at a crossroads

This team isn鈥檛 what it once was, both on and off the field. The close-minded, radical shift extends beyond the stands.

Players, too, are expected to tow the line. As I reported previously, players with differing political opinions have found themselves benched and even traded. There鈥檚 a chilling uniformity of thought demanded by this radical element that stifles genuine expression. Past players and staff have privately expressed frustration with “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH.

The Sounders are at a crossroads. Do they continue to capitulate to a radical few, sacrificing their broad appeal and long-term viability, leading to closed-off sections of the stadium to seem less empty on broadcasts? Or do they finally enforce their own rules, prioritize the game, and remember that professional sports are meant to unite, not divide? The Sounders are a victim of their own politically charged priorities and cowardice when faced with their antisemitic extremist supporters.

They are why I stopped attending games. I take my kids to sporting events. Not political rallies disguised as sports 鈿斤笍

鈥� Brian Williams (@blazerbrian1)

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

Listen to the Jake and Spike Show every weekday from 12pm – 3pm on 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM. Listen to 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM or go to MyNorthwest.com to learn more!

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

For years, the prevailing left-wing narrative has dismissed the significance of biological sex differences in athletic competition. Any assertion of obvious biological differences is framed as discriminatory or a bigoted attack on identity. The basics of biology was set aside in favor of a more fluid, socially constructed understanding of human physiology.

Oh how times have changed. At least for a few moments.

FIFA studies female-only injury links. Shouldn’t the Left call this controversial?

A FIFA-commissioned study, highlighted by KING 5, confronts an uncomfortable truth: “Women are two to eight times more likely to tear their anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) than men.” The research further suspects that female hormones like estrogen and relaxin, which fluctuate during the menstrual cycle, can increase risk of injury.

“Female athletes are at increased risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The influence of hormonal variation on female ACL injury risk remains ill-defined. Recent data suggests that the collagen-degrading menstrual hormone relaxin may cyclically impact female ACL tissue quality. This review aims to identify any correlation between menstrual relaxin peaks and rates of female ACL injury,” the claimed.

This revelation鈥攖hat inherent biological disparities between the sexes influence athletic performance and susceptibility to injury鈥攊s inconvenient for the established progressive narrative. One might anticipate a dismissal of such findings as perpetuating outdated biological determinism. Instead, the response from some of the very athletes who have championed these progressive viewpoints has been one of enthusiastic acceptance.

Woke athletes celebrate study

On their , former professional athletes Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe discussed the study.

Bird mocked the idea that the study is “groundbreaking” because when she suffered an ACL tear in the late 90s, she said the first thing her doctors asked her was whether or not she was on her period. “Where has this research been? We’ve known this!” she noted.

Rapinoe agreed, hoping that they’ll actually study “what we can do about it,” rather than if there’s a link, since they’ve already known about that link. She said she was on her period for all three of her ACL tears.

The are now demanding gendered-studies? Perhaps the researchers can even things out by needlessly studying transgender women?

Woke athletes suddenly recognize gender?

It is interesting that when the discussion pertains to their own physical well-being, the intricate biological realities of being a woman鈥攕pecifically female hormones and the menstrual cycle鈥攁re suddenly deemed “paramount” and critical.

Bird, Rapinoe and all the others celebrating the study stopped to pretend there’s no differences between men and women, even if it was for just a moment. They know there is an underlying recognition of distinct, undeniable biological differences. Yet they pretend otherwise in interviews when they can earn woke social currency.

The profound hypocrisy inherent in this position cannot be overstated.

For years, these very individuals and their ideological allies have vigorously argued against the notion that biological males, who identify as “women” or “trans women,” possess an inherent physiological advantage over biological females in sports. Any mention of male puberty, bone density, muscle mass, or lung capacity has been denounced as “transphobic” and discriminatory. We have been warned to ignore these biological realities as irrelevant in the name of inclusivity.

However, the FIFA study’s focus is explicitly on women’s bodies, female hormones, and physiological factors unique to biological females. One must ask: Are “trans women” included in this research to assess if their (non-existent) menstrual cycles affect their ACLs? The answer, unequivocally, is no. This omission is not arbitrary; it comes from a fundamental understanding that “trans women” are biological men. The study, by its very design, implicitly acknowledges and relies upon the irreducible biological distinctions between the sexes.

Add this to long list of studies proving the Radical Left wrong on gender

If there were genuinely no relevant biological differences between men and women impacting athletic performance, there would be no logical basis for a study exclusively focused on a female-specific injury pattern linked to female-specific biological processes.

This situation reveals an inconsistency.聽 On one hand, biological reality is denied to advance a specific, woke political agenda. On the other, biological reality is embraced wholeheartedly when it serves personal performance and injury prevention.

The FIFA study, while focused on a specific athletic injury, inadvertently serves as a powerful affirmation of biological reality that the vast majority of Americans have been pointing out throughout the entirety of the Democrats’ war on gender and women. It exposes the intellectual dishonesty of those who choose to selectively acknowledge scientific truths.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

Listen to the Jake and Spike Show every weekday from 12pm – 3pm on 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM. Listen to 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM or go to MyNorthwest.com to learn more!

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

It was Sunday, a day usually reserved for a bit of relaxation before a week of radio and television broadcasts, with a few peaceful, long walks with . But in Seattle, even my dog can鈥檛 escape the lunacy that spills out onto our streets. We walked by a gathering of the usual suspects, all geared up to oppose President Donald Trump鈥檚 decisive action against Iran鈥檚 nuclear weapon ambitions. And that鈥檚 when D’Artagnan, usually a well-behaved if high-energy pup, decided to offer his own, rather vocal, opinion.

I鈥檝e been working with D’Artagnan on his anxiety in loud, crowded spaces. He鈥檚 a smart dog, but a sudden cacophony of shouting strangers with body odor and clothes that haven’t been washed in weeks will obviously make him a little antsy. Yet, as the chants grew louder and the signs waved, my pup didn’t just get antsy; he got righteously indignant. He bristled, a low growl rumbling in his chest, then erupted into a chorus of sharp barks, snapping at the air in the direction of the earnest, sign-waving crowd and anyone who came up to pet him, thinking he was a K9 comrade. He most certainly was not.

And honestly, can you blame him?

A shrill woman leads the Seattle crowd in unhinged chants.

鈥� Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz)

D’Artagnan has been trained to spot danger

These weren’t your garden-variety protestors. These were the folks railing against America, justifying the very regime that funds global terror, and, in some cases, openly spouting antisemitic rhetoric and promoting socialism.

One male speaker, apparently under the delusion that he was channeling a civil rights icon, blathered, “The Iranian and American people alike do not want another ‘Forever War.’ Trump is spitting in our faces. We are forced to learn this about the US war machine time and time again. As Martin Luther King Jr pointed out decades ago, and I quote, ‘The bombs in Vietnam explode at home.'”

The sheer intellectual dishonesty is breathtaking. These aren’t carpet bombs on a village. This is targeted decapitation of a terrorist apparatus that has destabilized an entire region for decades. It’s not about “destroying the village to save it,” as another speaker melodramatically quoted from the Vietnam War. It’s about taking out the very architects of that destruction.

My two-year-old pup D鈥橝rtagnan kept snapping at the pro-Iran activists at the Seattle rally.

I caught some of his barking and growling at a 鈥渄e-escalation鈥� volunteer (a pregnant on; she was not a threat).

I鈥檓 not especially mad. He鈥檚 not trained to de-escalate.

Sound on.

鈥� Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz)

Barking at the enemy

D’Artagnan鈥檚 barks intensified, particularly when a “De-escalation Volunteer” approached to say hello. The irony was thick.

My dog, a creature of pure instinct whom I adopted as a stray in Mexico (he came here legally, I think), was barking at the “peace” activist, clearly sensing a threat to the natural order of things. Perhaps D’Artagnan understood what these activists couldn’t or wouldn’t: that sometimes you have to bark back at the threat, kind of like what Trump and Israel did with Iran.

If she truly wanted to de-escalate something, she could have started with her own movement supporting Hamas terrorists and their Iranian regime backers.

Another male voice piped up, painting a world where, “Both the Republican and Democratic parties are in lockstep when it comes to war. They both sign off on bombs, sanctions, and interventions.”

This is the kind of moral equivalence that only a privileged few, safe in their Western democracies, can afford. They demonize legitimate defense while ignoring the actual terror committed by regimes they seem determined to defend.

Then came the female speaker, warning of “a global war” and the “recklessness of our ruling class and their unending interest to get the most profits in their pockets, no matter the cost.” The predictable anti-capitalist trope, of course. Because in their world, geopolitical strategy isn’t about protecting national interests or preventing a rogue regime from acquiring nuclear weapons; it’s always about “profits.” It鈥檚 a convenient narrative for those who prefer to blame their own country for every ill in the world.

Surrounded by ignorance

One of my favorites of the ignorant speakers came from a woman (apologies, I assumed gender) conflating military action with domestic policy failures.

“Kidnapping and brutalizing our black sisters and brothers all across the country and throwing them in jail, funding wars, funding ICE, funding the police, that takes a higher priority than anything else,” she said. “And that’s why we can’t have affordable health care, that’s why we can’t have quality education, that’s why we don’t have access to healthy food or a robust public transportation system or anything.”

Because obviously, the only reason we don’t have utopian healthcare and robust public transit is because we’re not letting Iran build nukes.

Obviously, the activists hate Israel

But the real heart-wrencher, meant to tug at every bleeding heart, came from a self-identified second-generation Iranian immigrant: “My father currently lives in Yazd, and the first text I received this morning was a text message from a friend that Yazd had been struck by Israeli missiles… I don’t have words to describe how terrifying it can be to know if your loved ones are alive or dead… The West claims that Iran has nuclear weapons, and they say that Iran is a threat. Last night in a nationally televised address, war criminal, Donald Trump, called Iran the number one state sponsor of terror. Despite that, there is only one nation that is bombing country after country. The apartheid state of Israel has been actively terrorizing multiple countries in Southwest Asia, all while engaging in ethnic cleansing as they work to slaughter the Palestinian people.”

There it is. The blatant victim-blaming, the twisted narrative that paints Israel as the aggressor, and ignores Iran’s decades of sponsoring terrorism. Then claim that the “US media does not actually cover what happens in Iran… accurately… authentically.” What do they want us to cover? The glorious parades of anti-Americanism? The public hangings of dissidents?

Bombing Iran’s nuclear sites was necessary

For decades, we鈥檝e tried negotiation with Iran. Each time, they鈥檝e laughed in our faces, continued their clandestine nuclear programs, and funded terrorist proxies like Hamas, Houthis, and Hezbollah.

This isn’t the Iraq War, where we sent hundreds of thousands of troops into a prolonged, costly ground campaign. These are surgical strikes designed to cripple their ability to threaten regional and global security. This is not about regime change in the traditional sense; it’s about denying a rogue regime the tools to fulfill its openly stated desire to wipe out nations and develop weapons of mass destruction.

So, when D’Artagnan, my otherwise sweet and cuddly Malinois mix, starts barking and snapping at a crowd of anti-American, pro-Iran apologists, I can鈥檛 exactly scold him. Some things, some threats, are just instinctively understood. And sometimes, a dog’s gut reaction is clearer than any nuanced, politically correct analysis.

Good boy, D’Artagnan. Good boy.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

Walk down Blanchard Street between Second and Third Avenues at any time of day, and you鈥檒l see the decay firsthand: open-air drug deals, addicts smoking fentanyl, and mentally ill homeless people wandering naked or sexually harassing women. Trash lines the sidewalks. The once-popular fenced-in dog park is now virtually unusable. At the nearby bus stop on Third Avenue, commuters cling to their belongings, heads on swivels, waiting for a bus to get them out of there.

But for the people who live and work in Belltown, there is no easy escape. They鈥檙e desperate for the city to intervene. Instead, officials have let the neighborhood spiral into the dangerous mess it has become.

A homeless man sets up a base camp in Belltown. (Photo: Jason Rantz, KTTH Radio)

“It can be very stressful… just turned the corner every day and wondering what’s going to be outside your business today, whether it’s going to be safe, whether you’re going to get pepper sprayed, whether you’re going to have to clean up human feces or get piles of garbage, fentanyl leftovers, all kinds of garbage that’s left behind,” the manager of a business on 3rd and Blanchard explained exclusively to “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH. (Note: I am a customer.)

Homeless addicts knock out, pepper-spray random passers-by

The business manager asked for anonymity out of fear that she would be targeted. She also lives on the block, so she experiences the harassment, drug use, and criminal behavior daily.

“Some of our employees have been physically attacked,” she explained. “One was knocked out, and then picked off the ground and hit repeatedly by somebody who thought they were looking at them the wrong way, and that was someone who was just walking into work. That person was quite a small person, and they were badly injured, concussed. We’ve been pepper-sprayed by people. We’ve had people break windows, which was a great expense, and actually took away a key component of the business.”

She said she’s forced to keep her door locked at all times to keep her staff and clients safe.

The neighborhood has been under siege for over two years and is part of an area of emphasis for Seattle Police and the city’s Unified Care Team. Despite their efforts, the situation isn’t getting any better, and Mayor Bruce Harrell’s office isn’t responding to requests for comment on what can be done.

Homeless people have overrun the Belltown neighborhood between Second and Third Avenue on Blanchard St. (Photo: Jason Rantz, KTTH)

Seattle Police making a dent, but benefits don’t last

The Seattle Police Department (SPD) has been more focused on the neighborhood in the last several weeks.

“SPD routinely arrests suspects during narcotics operations throughout the Downtown core, Belltown, and the Chinatown-International District. West Precinct officers also proactively make arrests during their regular patrol shifts every day,” an SPD spokesperson explained to “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH. “SPD also participates in the Downtown Activation Zone with other City departments. Narcotics operations and arrests often occur during these cleanups.”

While the Belltown business manager said the SPD makes a difference鈥攊t’s ephemeral. After recent undercover operations that arrested suspected drug dealers, the problem has returned and even worsened.

“We got to know them [the drug dealers who were arrested] and they tend to almost be helpful, the ones that were there in the beginning,” the manager explained. “It’s kind of a funny coexistence, but they know that keeping people off our business front is better for them. The more noise we create, the worse it is for them, so they were actually helpful.”

After the arrests, new drug dealers came into the area, some of them look as if they’re addicts themselves. They’ve not worked to keep homeless addicts from interfering with the business she manages.

CARE Team to the rescue?

Dr. Amy Barden leads the city’s Community Assisted Response and Engagement (CARE) team, which is tasked with managing community crisis responders and behavioral health specialists as they offer services and assistance to the area’s growing homeless population.

In an interview with “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH, she said the area is in an emphasis zone that the city remains hyper-focused on, but acknowledges the region doesn’t have a comprehensive strategy.

“You can connect people to services, but then we need a system to refer to. We need 24/7 detox,” she said, explaining that regional crisis centers will be helpful once fully operational.

“You need a really good place-based strategy that’s more comprehensive,” Barden explained. “I feel like until we get to a place where we consistently have all the helpers, where you have adequate police staffing. We do need CARE responders, and we’ve got the and folks like that. But I’m always saying…I don’t have a system to refer to. So officers can make an arrest, but then if that person doesn’t get booked or if they don’t come into services, it’s not really doing anything. It’s not that I don’t think you should at least signal that this [open drug use] is not lawful. I appreciate that we’re doing that, but I think with drugs like fentanyl, I’m not meeting people in recovery who are saying, ‘Yeah, the arrest alone was a deterrent to break the cycle.'”

Homeless people have overrun the Belltown neighborhood between Second and Third Avenue on Blanchard Street. In this photo, you can see tin foil used to smoke fentanyl. (Photo: Jason Rantz, KTTH)

What about employees and residents?

As understaffed city agencies tiptoe around enforcement, Mayor Bruce Harrell has once again refused to lead.

Rather than focus on the core responsibilities of his office, Harrell delegates the heavy lifting to his deputy mayors while he bounces between dinner parties and public appearances. He continues to downplay the city鈥檚 worsening homelessness crisis. His biggest 鈥渁ccomplishment鈥� downtown? Hanging a block away from where a large homeless contingent once stood. The kicker? The city didn鈥檛 even cover the electric bill鈥攐ne struggling business owner was unknowingly stuck paying for the power.

Now, half the homeless population that once filled downtown has simply migrated to Belltown, where they spend their days openly smoking fentanyl. The other half has trickled back into downtown, but are now spread out, avoiding concentrated visibility, giving off the impression that the mayor has been effective on tackling homelessness. He has not been.

The manager in Belltown says she has little hope that things will improve. Just days ago, there was another shooting. Cops pass through but rarely make arrests, even as addicts use drugs in plain sight. And those addicts? They鈥檙e not getting help鈥攖hey鈥檙e being abandoned to die in public while city leaders pretend their plan is working.

“It’s kind of terrifying when you see how people are reacting, people with open sores on their bodies, and they’re taking their clothes off when it’s raining or cold outside,” she said. “So it’s kind of terrifying. We’ve seen deaths out front. There have been a couple of people who have died and overdosed. And it breaks your heart when you see a young person out there overdosing. And it’s not once a week, it’s several times a week.”

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

“Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier,” President Trump said from the White House in a Saturday night address.

“This cannot continue,” Trump added. “There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight’s was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill.”

KTTH hosts responded to air strikes with strong support

Afternoon host Jason Rantz noted that, “You can鈥檛 negotiate with Iran 鈥� the last two decades have proven that. This was necessary.” He also said that “60 days means 60 days,” a reference to a deadline for Iran to agree to end its plans to develop nuclear weapons.

We didn’t declare war.

鈥� Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz)

Midday host Guy Benson, also a Fox News contributor, called the strikes the “correct decision.” But he warns of danger ahead.

“Iran has a ballistic weapons arsenal (though Israel has largely defanged it) and terrorist cells. Two causes for trepidation鈥� and also two reasons why preventing Iran from getting nukes is absolutely the right call,” Benson said.

Evening host Mark Levin, meanwhile,

Awesome

鈥� Armstrong and Getty (@AandGShow)

Mission accomplished!馃嚭馃嚫

鈥� Rich Vald茅s 馃嚭馃嚫 (@RichValdes)

Extraordinary egg on the face tonight of the Lindbergh-esque isolationists on the 鈥淩ight鈥� cosplaying as 鈥淢AGA鈥� and imputing to 鈥淎merica First鈥� views that (1) are not actually America First and (2) are not held by Trump himself.

Touch some grass and shut the hell up for a while.

鈥� Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer)

“I’ve seen through my career how music can bridge divides, it can provide solace to those who are in need, and provide fortitude and clarity,” Ondrasik said on “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH. “(After 9/11) America came together in ways I’d never seen before, and haven’t seen since.”

I am Honored to collaborate with current hostage Alon Ohel鈥檚 mother Idit, brother Ronen, family and friends with this new version of 鈥淪uperman鈥� to support Alon, all the hostages, and their families.

May they all 鈥淔ind a way to Fly – To a home I will soon see鈥� 馃帡锔忦煣� 馃嚭馃嚫馃嚠馃嚤鈥�

鈥� John Ondrasik (@johnondrasik)

‘Superman’ dedicated to Israeli hostages

Ondrasik revised “Superman” to better reflect the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, putting a focus on the hostages left in the wake.

“I was reached out to by a hostage who has been in Gaza for more than 620 days, and her son is a piano player,” Ondrasik said. “She said, ‘Can we do something musically to keep the spotlight on the hostages,’ and I thought a new version of ‘Superman’ would be appropriate.”

To Ondrasik, supporting the hostages and victims of the Hamas terrorist attacks on October 7 was a no-brainer.

“I’m not Jewish. You don’t have to be Jewish to condemn Hamas. You just have to be sane,” Ondrasik said. “We’ve seen such a horrible disgrace from the music industry. They stand for human rights and women’s rights, but their silence on October 7 has been disgraceful.”

Five for Fighting鈥檚 singer calls out Macklemore

Ondrasik said he’s been disappointed by the music industry’s response to the terrorism against Jews, with some artists, including , for embracing antisemitism at a Palestine Will Live Forever Festival in Seattle last September.

“The first feeling is shame, it’s a shame that I’m a part of this industry,” Ondrasik said. “You see the younger acts like Macklemore and these bands that have been seduced by wokeism, and of course, that makes you angry.”

He argued that the artists who stood with him in New York after 9/11, should speak out again.

“They know better. They know that Hamas is evil, and they have remained silent. And that harkens back to 1938 when those with an influence remained silenced before the Holocaust,” Ondrasik said.

Listen to the full conversation below.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH and the KTTH App, or on-demand wherever you listen to podcasts.

More info on The Jason Rantz Show here: /jason-rantz/

The motion for a preliminary injunction, filed in King County Superior Court, seeks an emergency closure of the park until the City produces a plan to stop the illegal behavior and restore safety. The hearing is set for July 11 before Judge Samuel Chung.

“For over 100 years, Denny Blaine Park was a small gem in the Olmsted Park System,” the motion stated. “The park is now a venue for public masturbation, public sex, and illegal drug use that attracts criminals from around the region and makes the park a public nuisance.”

Denny Blaine Park has been derisively labeled “Pervert Park” on the .

New video evidence emerges at ‘Perv Park’ in Seattle

The plaintiffs submitted more than a dozen declarations and exhibits, including new video evidence, incident logs, and photos that depict a daily pattern of lewd and dangerous behavior. One declaration identifies individuals by nickname, tracking their repeated and often graphic appearances in the park. Among the alleged conduct: filming of sex acts, harassment of park visitors, used needles and condoms littering the grounds, and aggressive nudity, even in the presence of children.

Multiple witnesses say the behavior has persisted for years, despite repeated 911 calls and formal complaints. The plaintiffs include LGBTQ residents, parents, and longtime homeowners, many of whom say they no longer feel safe visiting the park.

One of the park鈥檚 most high-profile neighbors, philanthropist Stuart Sloan, said he personally met with Mayor Bruce Harrell in 2022 to show him disturbing photos of sexual activity at the park. According to Sloan鈥檚 declaration, the mayor appeared shocked and promised to act. But those promises have not resulted in meaningful change, and the situation has worsened.

Even Friends of Denny Blaine, a nudist-friendly advocacy group, has acknowledged the severity of the problem. A recent poll they conducted found that nearly 50% of their followers had witnessed either public masturbation or sex acts in the park, according to one declaration.

Seattle is choosing to keep the park lawless

Seattle has previously shuttered other parks under similar circumstances, including Hoa Mai Park in the Chinatown/International District, which was closed in spring 2025 due to illegal activity. The difference, plaintiffs say, is that Denny Blaine Park鈥檚 issues are well-documented, yet the City has done nothing.

鈥淭his isn鈥檛 about banning nudity,鈥� the plaintiffs argue. 鈥淭his is about banning criminal behavior.鈥�

But Denny Blaine Park has become politically treacherous for Mayor Harrell, who is in the middle of a re-election campaign. Progressive activists have claimed that criticism of the park is meant to shut down a space that is favored by the Seattle LGBT community as a “safe space.” Advocates for the park have either ignored or downplayed the criminal behavior at the park.

How will the judge respond?

The City of Seattle, which has not yet filed its response to the motion, previously denied the park is a nuisance. Yet internal records submitted with the lawsuit show officials are aware of the activity. One Parks Department webpage even references plans to add a “public masturbation deterrent infrastructure.”

For now, residents are asking the court to step in where the City has failed.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. 鈥� 7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听, and聽.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

Listen to the Jake and Spike Show every weekday from 12pm – 3pm on 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM. Listen to 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM or go to MyNorthwest.com to learn more!

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on AM 770 KTTH or on-demand wherever you listen to podcast

Listen to the Jake and Spike Show every weekday from 12pm – 3pm on 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM. Listen to 成人X站 Newsradio 97.3 FM or go to MyNorthwest.com to learn more!