成人X站

Imagine you’re at the doctor’s office worried about an illness, and the physician turns to his computer and pulls up for a diagnosis. We’re not far from that happening and that could be a good thing, but it comes with pitfalls.

In the same way patients scour tapping into their symptoms and doomscrolling a long list of possible problems, doctors now use Google as a source of information.

reports AI bots may be next. Dr. Gary Franklin, a University of Washington research professor, described an experience with When Franklin asked Gemini for information on the outcomes of a specific procedure the bot gave a detailed answer that cited two medical studies, neither of which existed.

MyNorthwest News: Black Friday, Cyber Monday sales break records with buyers using AI, phones

Franklin wrote that it鈥檚 鈥渂uyer beware when it comes to using AI chatbots to extract accurate scientific information or evidence-based guidance.鈥� He recommended that AI experts develop specialized chatbots that pull information only from verified sources.

One expert working toward a solution is Lucy Lu Wang, a UW assistant professor in Wang has developed tools to extract important information from medical research papers, verify scientific claims, and make scientific images accessible to blind and low-vision readers.

鈥淒octors use Google a lot, but they also rely on services like which provide really great summaries of medical information and research,鈥� Franklin said. 鈥淢ost doctors have zero time and just want to be able to read something very quickly that is well documented. So from a physician鈥檚 perspective, trying to find truthful answers, trying to make my practice more efficient, trying to coordinate things better 鈥� if this technology could meaningfully contribute to any of those things, then it would be unbelievably great.鈥�

Franklin added, 鈥淚鈥檓 not sure how much doctors will use AI, but for many years, patients have been coming in with questions about what they found on the internet, like on WebMD. AI is just the next step of patients doing this, getting some guidance about what to do with the advice they鈥檙e getting. As an example, if a patient sees a surgeon who鈥檚 overly aggressive and says they need a big procedure, the patient could ask an AI tool what the broader literature might recommend. And I have concerns about that.鈥�

National News: OpenAI鈥檚 Sam Altman 鈥榥ot that worried鈥� about rival Elon Musk鈥檚 influence in the Trump administration

Wang echoed Franklin鈥檚 sentiments, noting that clinicians want to look up information very quickly because they鈥檙e so taxed and there鈥檚 limited time to treat patients. 鈥淵ou can imagine if the tools that we have, these chatbots, were actually very good at searching for information and very good at citing accurately, that they could become a better replacement for a type of tool like UpToDate,鈥� she said. 鈥淏ecause UpToDate is good, it鈥檚 human-curated, but it doesn鈥檛 always contain the most fine-grained information you might be looking for.鈥�

Wang also highlighted the potential benefits for patient communication. 鈥淭hese tools could also potentially help clinicians with patient communication, because there鈥檚 not always enough time to follow up or explain things in a way that patients can understand. It鈥檚 an add-on part of the job for clinicians, and that鈥檚 where I think language models and these tools, in an ideal world, could be really beneficial.鈥�

On the patient鈥檚 side, Wang said it would be amazing to develop tools that help with patient education and increase the overall health literacy of the population, beyond what WebMD or Google does. 鈥淭hese tools could engage patients with their own health and health care more than before,鈥� she said.

Franklin and Wang both see potential for AI to improve coordination across the health care system and between physicians. 鈥淭here was a book called 鈥楥rossing the Quality Chasm鈥� that argued the main problem in American medicine is poor coordination,鈥� Franklin said.

Wang added that socio-technical problems need to be addressed, such as developing models with the specific goal of supporting scientific search. 鈥淧eople are, in fact, working toward these things and have demonstrated good preliminary results,鈥� she said.

鈥淚 think the citation problem has already been overcome in research demonstration cases,” Wang explained. “If we, for example, hook up an LLM to PubMed search and allow it only to cite conclusions based on articles that are indexed in then actually the models are very faithful to citations that are retrieved from that search engine. But if you use Gemini and ChatGPT, those are not always hooked up to those research databases.鈥�

鈥淭he problem is that a person trying to search using those tools doesn鈥檛 know that,鈥� Franklin noted.

Reflecting on the impact of resources like WebMD, Wang said, 鈥淏efore its existence, patients really did have a hard time finding any information at all. And of course, there鈥檚 limited face time with clinicians where people actually get to ask those questions. So for every patient who wrongly self-diagnoses on WebMD, there are probably also hundreds of patients who found a quick answer to a question. I think that with these models, it鈥檚 going to be similar. They鈥檙e going to help address some of the gaps in clinical care where we don鈥檛 currently have enough resources.鈥�

Bill Kaczaraba is a content editor at MyNorthwest. You can read his stories here. Follow Bill on X, formerly known as Twitter, and email him here.听