³ÉÈËXÕ¾

In the chaos of the COVID-19 pandemic, we learned one thing: public health isn’t just about science – it’s also a political battleground. Enter , a new piece of legislation that was advanced on Friday in the House Health Care and Wellness Committee with an 11-7 vote, split strictly along party lines.

Democrats, in control, pushed it forward, while Republicans lined up to oppose it. So, what’s it really all about?

At its core, HB 1531 aims to establish a rule that any public health response to diseases must be based on “the best available science.” The goal? To ensure that health policies, like vaccines and disease control, are rooted in solid, evidence-backed strategies. Sounds pretty straightforward, right? But, as with most things these days, it’s a lot more complicated than it seems.

The pandemic’s political side show

During the pandemic, Former Washington Governor Jay Inslee didn’t exactly ask for permission when he used his executive powers to push health mandates through the state’s Department of Health. He said at the time he was making the tough calls to keep people safe, but not everyone saw it that way.

For some, it felt like the state was calling all the shots without listening to local concerns. It was a clash between the need for swift action and the desire for local control.

This is where HB 1531 comes in. The bill essentially says, “Let’s make sure public health decisions stay rooted in science and let’s not let local policies get in the way of that.”

The bill’s sponsor, Representative Dan Bronoske (D-Lakewood), told the committee he chairs, “This bill does not carry any mandates. What the bill does do is require that local health authorities base their response to communicable diseases on the best available science, on the safety and efficacy of evidence-based practices – full stop.”

If any local rule or law contradicts these science-based measures, the bill declares them null and void. The idea is to make sure there’s no room for political interference, but, of course, not everyone agrees with that.

More MyNW politics: Revised bill overhauling governor’s emergency powers, weakened by democrats say republicans

Democrats defend science, Republicans defend local control

Republicans didn’t just give a thumbs-down to the bill; they came ready to make changes. A total of 22 amendments were thrown into the mix, but all of them were shot down.

The amendments ranged from asking for more local control over health decisions to demanding clearer guidelines on what counts as “best available science.” But with an 11-7 vote, the bill passed through the committee on a strict party-line vote, with Democrats saying yes and Republicans saying no.

Representative Matt Marshall (R-Eatonville) argued that HB 1531 is a step too far, essentially giving power to unelected bureaucrats.

“The concern here is that things have been politicized and that they will continue to be politicized. And do the people want unelected bureaucrats in the health departments telling us what to do?” he said.

He argued there should be legislative oversight “to make sure that we have appropriate responses.”

The bill may sound great in theory – who doesn’t want decisions based on science? – but the big worry is that it’s another move to centralize power in the state health department, which may not always be using the ‘best science,’ leaving local governments with fewer options to respond to unique challenges.

‘B±ð³Ù°ù²¹²â²¹±ô’: Ukrainian-Americans in Seattle slam Trump, prepare to protest

The future of HB 1531

The bill’s not a done deal just yet. With the committee approval behind it, it’s headed to the full House for more debate. There’s still plenty of time for it to change, and it’s clear this conversation isn’t going to end anytime soon.

Matt Markovich is the ³ÉÈËXÕ¾ Newsradio political analyst.