³ÉÈËXÕ¾

With six school bonds set for a public vote on Tuesday, efforts to reduce the voter approval requirement for school district bonds in Washington have stalled, casting doubt on their future.

Legislative stagnation

, introduced to lower the supermajority threshold for school bond approvals from 60% to 55%, received its initial public hearing on January 16, 2025. Despite overwhelming support from school districts statewide, the bill has not progressed to a committee vote.

Notably, Senator Lisa Wellman (D-Mercer Island), chair of the , has yet to schedule further action on the bill — an indication the legislation may be stalled indefinitely.

Implications for upcoming bond measures

This legislative impasse comes as six school districts across Washington prepare to present bond measures to voters on February 11, 2025.

These districts aim to secure funding for the construction of new schools and the renovation of existing facilities. Under the current constitutional mandate, these measures require a 60% supermajority to pass — a formidable hurdle that has historically prevented many districts from obtaining necessary funding.

For instance, the Lake Stevens School District is rerunning its $314 million bond proposal to address growth, replace aging facilities and enhance safety measures. Despite maintaining the same project scope and bond amount, the district has adjusted its proposal to offer a lower tax impact for property owners, thanks to reduced interest rates and a growing taxpayer base.

Similarly, the Issaquah School District is presenting a $231.6 million bond measure — a 63% reduction from its previous proposal in November — aimed at addressing the district’s most immediate needs.

“At the end of the day, this is about giving local control to communities to decide whether they want to build schools,” says bill co-sponsor Senator Adrian Cortes (D-Battle Ground).
He added, “This is not about raising property taxes, as some would have you believe. This is about local control.”

A fart tax? State lawmaker suggests sports fans pay up for methane emissions

Lack of needed school upgrades

During the public hearing, Orting Middle School Principal Kevin Collins told the committee that district voters had rejected six bond measures in the last nine years.

“Five of these six, however, received a majority of support. Three of the six would have passed with the 55% threshold. And this past November, we saw 59% voter support, and we were just 100 votes shy of passing,” he said.

“We are overcrowded. We have 250 students at one of our elementary schools using one set of bathrooms. We have paraeducators and specialists in closets,” he added.

Lack of confidence in school spending

Opponents of lowering the approval threshold argue that maintaining a higher standard ensures broader community consensus before incurring long-term debt obligations.

“The only reason we vote no is because we are so frustrated with our educational system — the fact that less than half of our kids can read and write,” Loretta Byrns, a concerned parent who opposes the bill, said.

“We’re frustrated with our legislature driving up the cost of making new buildings, of designing buildings. That’s why we say no, and that’s why I’m against reducing the requirement from 60 to 50 or 55%,” she added.

‘It’s disgusting’: WA Attorney General’s Office sparks legal battle against Trump order on gender-affirming care

Requires constitutional amendment

Senate Bill 5186 would require an amendment to the to take effect. The current 60% supermajority requirement for school bond approvals is enshrined in the state constitution.

For the bill to become law, two key steps are required: A proposed constitutional amendment must be approved by two-thirds of both chambers of the , and the amendment must then be placed on the ballot for a statewide general election, where it must receive a simple majority (50%+1) of voter approval.

Without these steps, the bill cannot take effect, even if passed by the Legislature. The bill itself explicitly states that it is contingent on voter approval of a constitutional amendment.

Matt Markovich often covers the state legislature and public policy for ³ÉÈËXÕ¾ Newsradio. You can read more of Matt’s stories here. Follow him on , or email him here.