成人X站

After months of delays, a hearing starts Tuesday to decide whether Erik and Lyle Menendez should get a chance at freedom after serving nearly 30 years in prison for the double murder of their parents.

A Los Angeles judge will preside over the resentencing hearing that is expected to last two days. If he shortens their sentences, the brothers would still need approval from the state鈥檚 parole board to get out of prison. They could then potentially go free on time served.

They were sentenced in 1996 to life in prison without the possibility of parole for murdering their father Jose Menendez and mother Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills home in 1989. The brothers were 18 and 21 at the time of the killings. While defense attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors said the brothers killed their parents for a multimillion-dollar inheritance.

Due to wildfires in the LA area, and disputes between LA prosecutors and defense attorneys, the hearings were delayed for months.

The case has captured the public鈥檚 attention for decades 鈥� and last year, the Netflix drama 鈥� Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story 鈥� and documentary 鈥淭he Menendez Brothers鈥� brought new attention to the case. Supporters of the brothers have flown in from across the country to attend rallies and hearings in the past few months.

Here’s what to expect this week:

Judge to rule on a lesser sentence

The resentencing hearing will center on whether the brothers have been rehabilitated in prison and deserve a lesser sentence of 50 years to life. That would make them eligible for parole under California鈥檚 youthful offender law because they committed the crime under the age of 26.

Their defense attorney, Mark Geragos, said in April he may ask the judge to reduce their charges to manslaughter, potentially allowing them to be immediately released.

Geragos said last Friday that he plans to call at least seven family members to testify at the hearings. As in previous proceedings, the brothers will appear virtually. It was unclear if they will testify.

Los Angeles County prosecutors will be arguing against the resentencing. They say the brothers have not taken complete responsibility for the crime. Prosecutors will likely reference the preliminary findings from a forensic psychologist who looked at whether the brothers pose a risk to society if released, an assessment ordered by the state parole board. The admissibility of the results in court have been a point of contention for the two sides, as they have not been made public, but the judge said last Friday that some parts can be included.

Former district attorney and fami
ly support resentencing

The previous LA County District Attorney George Gasc贸n had opened the door to possible freedom for the brothers last fall by asking a judge to reduce their sentences. His office said the case would鈥檝e been handled differently today due to modern understandings of sexual abuse and trauma, and the brothers鈥� rehabilitation over three decades in prison.

A resentencing petition laid out by Gasc贸n focuses on the brothers鈥� accomplishments and rehabilitation. The brothers鈥� attorneys say their clients have worked hard to better themselves and give back to the prison community. The extended Menendez family, with the exception of an uncle who died in March, has said they fully forgive the brothers for what they did and want them to be freed.

Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for their fellow inmates.

The new LA prosecutor changed course

The current district attorney Nathan Hochman reversed course from Gasc贸n and opposed the brothers鈥� resentencing.

Hochman鈥檚 office has said it does not believe that the brothers were sexually abused by their father.

Prosecutors also say the brothers have not admitted to lying during their trial.

Recently, they cited the forensic psychologist’s analysis that said the brothers had recently broken prison rules by smuggling cellphones inside, which Hochman argued demonstrated an inability to regulate their own behavior. It came to the conclusion that they were 鈥渕oderately more likely鈥� than others to engage in violence in the community, Hochman said.

With Hochman in charge, prosecutors attempted twice to withdraw their office’s resentencing petition. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic ruled both times that the resentencing hearings could continue despite their opposition.

The judge could decide on the resentencing from the bench during the hearing or issue a written ruling later.