成人X站

The Seattle City Council accepted an ordinance drafted by advocate groups that will dramatically alter how the city deals with homeless encampments. It has caused a rift in Seattle’s support to solve its homeless crisis.

鈥淭his is not about where people should be living in public,鈥� told 成人X站 Radio’s Dori Monson. 鈥淭his is how can we refocus the attention of policy makers and public leaders in this community on the question of how are we going to get to the point where nobody is living in public.鈥�

ACLU homeless ordinance accepted by Seattle City Council

Daugaard is director of the Public Defender Association. She lands on the side of the proposed ordinance, which would allow people to camp in public spaces throughout Seattle.

In short, the ordinance would only allow city officials to oust people from an encampment if it is interfering with public use. The city must provide at least 48 hours notice of the eviction and find the residents a new place to camp. For encampments with at least five people, the city must provide sanitary services upon request. It was not drafted by city officials, rather, but the ACLU, Columbia Legal Services, and others. It was submitted to the council.

But Dori does not support it one bit.

鈥淭he more we open our arms to providing services and making things as easy as possible 鈥� and I know it鈥檚 not easy to live on the street 鈥� we become a magnet,” Dori argues. “The fact is that we鈥檝e spent $1 billion on homelessness over the last decade. I鈥檓 sure we鈥檝e had well-intentioned business leaders and politicians who had a 10-year plan to end homelessness, but the problem has gotten dramatically worse.”

Dori put forth this hypothetical situation to the homeless advocate: What if someone camps on a baseball or soccer field that people want to use. Technically, they would be given 48 hours and the public would have to wait.

鈥淩ealistically, that鈥檚 not actually happening,鈥� Daugaard responded. 鈥溾�� in general, people are willing to go, people are willing to behave reasonably if they鈥檙e given an alternative.鈥�

Daugaard also objects to Dori’s argument that Seattle will simply attract homeless people with such policies.

鈥淧eople are not coming to Seattle to be homeless because we鈥檙e providing porta-potties and dumpsters — because we鈥檙e not,” she said. “People are living outside in massive numbers, to a level that is an embarrassment, I think to all of us, and I know we all agree on all that.”

“This is a complex problem (that) needs serious public policy,” Daugaard said. 鈥淯ntil it鈥檚 resolved, it is in no one鈥檚 interest that people not have a place to go to the bathroom, that people do not have a place to dispose of their garbage.鈥�

MyNorthwest’s Eric Mandel contributed to this story.